<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Loving decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diversity.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/07/the-loving-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diversity.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/07/the-loving-decision/</link>
	<description>A look into the ethnic, religious and cultural diversity in Rockland County.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:16:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Denice Gross</title>
		<link>http://diversity.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/07/the-loving-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Denice Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/07/the-loving-decision/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>rvk79thoflwsgi6l</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rvk79thoflwsgi6l</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David V.</title>
		<link>http://diversity.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/07/the-loving-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>David V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/07/the-loving-decision/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a long time since I&#039;ve since that terrible word &quot;miscegenation.&quot;  Thankfully, it seems like ancient history since such words were part of normal discourse.

I think the Loving decision was a great decision.  It&#039;s hard to believe that as recently as 1967, certain states prohibited interracial marriage.  I understand it intellectually, but it&#039;s still hard to grasp the mindset behind it.

While most people continue to marry within their race, interracial relationships have become pretty unremarkable.  That&#039;s a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long time since I&#8217;ve since that terrible word &#8220;miscegenation.&#8221;  Thankfully, it seems like ancient history since such words were part of normal discourse.</p>
<p>I think the Loving decision was a great decision.  It&#8217;s hard to believe that as recently as 1967, certain states prohibited interracial marriage.  I understand it intellectually, but it&#8217;s still hard to grasp the mindset behind it.</p>
<p>While most people continue to marry within their race, interracial relationships have become pretty unremarkable.  That&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve C.</title>
		<link>http://diversity.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/07/the-loving-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diversity.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/07/the-loving-decision/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Thanx for this. I didnt know this bit of history, or maybe just didnt remember it. My wife and I as well as some friends can relate to this 100%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx for this. I didnt know this bit of history, or maybe just didnt remember it. My wife and I as well as some friends can relate to this 100%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
